FINM024 Corporate Social Responsibility and Governance Assessment Help provide FINM024 Corporate Social Responsibility and Governance Assignment Answer Help Australian students to score an A+ grade in a college project, guaranteed satisfaction. We are a team of professional assignment writing service who are subject experts; they also provide Corporate Finance Assignment Help. Suppose you need FINM024 Corporate Social Responsibility and Governance Assessment Help From us. Place your order now!



Assignment Details:

  • Words: 2000


The Assessment Task


Boards of directors are at the apex of organisations’ decision-making structures (Fama &  Jensen,  1983),  and  are  generally  considered  to  be  the  most  important  internal governance mechanism. The board thus has a crucial role in both conformance and performance of companies. Section 3 of the 2018 UK code of corporate governance is on board composition, succession and evaluation, whilst Section 5 is on Remuneration. As a governance analyst you have been asked to undertake  a  report  on  specific aspects of compliance with Sections 3 and 5 of the 2018 UK Code of Corporate Governance with regard to your allocated companies. To investigate company compliance each student will be allocated 2 FTSE350 companies.


Your task is to review the theoretical literature on board composition, and CEO remuneration and to examine the extent to which your companies comply with the reporting requirements in Section 3 and 5 of the code. Your report should include the following:


  1. An introduction to the domain of corporate governance and within it the role of boards.
  2. A critical review of the different theoretical perspectives on board composition, and CEO remuneration.
  3. A critical appraisal of the extent to which your companies comply with the reporting requirements of Sections 3 and 5 of the 2018 UK Code of Corporate Governance.
  4. A conclusion in which you include 2 or 3 recommendations to regulators on changes to future codes relating to Board Composition, Succession, Evalution, and CEO Compensation.


Learning Outcomes


On successful completion of this assessment, you will be able to:

  • Critically appraise the framework underlying governance law and practice in a national and international
  • Evaluate the academic underpinning, nature and importance of corporate governance and ethical behaviour and recognise governance problems to offer
  • Assess the requirement for, and impact of, financial reporting on a wide range of
  • Devise and sustain an argument, supported by valid and significant, evaluated
  • Communicate effectively with specialist and non-specialist audiences, demonstrating sensitivity to responsibilities  and contextual hierarchies  about the global networks involved in Corporate Governance.


Your grade will depend on the extent to which you meet these learning outcomes in the way relevant for this assessment. Please see the grading rubric on NILE for further details of the criteria against which you will be assessed.


Also Read: FINM012 Global Audit Environment Assessment Answer Help


Assessment Criteria


  • Thoroughness of understanding and evaluation of theories related to board composition, and CEO
  • Quality of critical appraisal of company compliance with Sections C and E of the 2018 UK Code of Corporate Governance.
  • Quality of recommendations and their
  • Professional and academic quality of written work and accuracy of


Assessment Support


Specific support sessions for this assessment will be provided by the module team and notified through NILE. You can also access individual support and guidance for your assessments from Library and Learning Services. Visit the Skills Hub to access this support and to discover the online support also available for assessments and academic skills.


Academic Integrity and Misconduct


Unless this is a group assessment, the work you produce must be your own, with work taken from any other source properly referenced and attributed. For the avoidance of doubt this means that it is an infringement of academic integrity and, therefore, academic misconduct to ask someone else to carry out all or some of the work for you, whether paid or unpaid, or to use the work of another student whether current or previously submitted.


For further guidance on what constitutes plagiarism, contract cheating or collusion, or any other infringement of academic integrity, please read the University’s Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy. Also useful resources to help with understanding academic integrity are available from UNPAC – the University of Northampton’s Plagiarism Avoidance Course.


For REF… Use: #getanswers2002050