Looking for EMBEMPP – Economic Management and Public Policy Assignment Question to Answers Solution? Get MBA Economics Homework, Project Management Assignment & MBA Assignment Help from PhD/MBA Experts at cost-effective rates? Acquire HD Quality research work with 100% Plagiarism free content.

 

Buy Professional Assignment Writing Help Services To Boost Your Grades

 

 

ASSIGNMENT QUESTION

 

Programme: Executive MBA
Module Code & Name: EMBEMPP – Economic Management and Public Policy
Business School: IEMD Graduate Business School, Spain
Course Leader:
Title: N/A

 

 

Assignment Tasks:

 

Part 1

 

  1. Anticipation of future demand is necessary to producers to arrange required factors of production to meet future demand. In light of this, discuss and giving examples, the importance of demand forecasting to a real organisation of your choice.
  2. Briefly explain the different methods of demand forecasting.

 

Part 2

 

In a changing climate, business that routinely incorporates climate change impacts and adaptation into their decision making will be better prepared and resilient than their competitors. With specific reference to a real organisation of your choice, discuss how climate change affects its decision making process.

 

The word count is 2,500 words (+/- 10%) for each part (1 and 2) with indexed headings & subheadings in the following format:

  • A Cover Page
  • Table of Contents
  • Introduction
  • Body
  • Conclusion
  • Reference Section

 

 

# The Harvard Referencing System must be adopted with in-text citations.

 

Further Instructions for Assignment.

 

  1. The general assessment criteria are: Substance, Originality of work, Presentation, Use of illustrations / examples, where appropriate.
  2. Independent research on the relevant topics is encouraged.
  3. Special consideration would be given to students who demonstrate an in-depth analysis of the questions.
  4. Candidates who simply regurgitate their answers from sources may risk getting a poor mark and may risk failing the paper outright if plagiarism is detected.
  5. Any similarities between individual assignments will result in a fail grade.
  6. The presentation format should be:
  • Top, Bottom margins : 1”
  • Left margins : 25”
  • Right margin : 8”
  • Header & Footer : 5”
  • Printing : Single Page A4 size
  • Vertical spacing : Double
  • Font type & size : Times Roman 12 pt
  • Binding : Comb
  • Page numbering : Page x of y (right justified in footer)
  1. Retain a copy of your assignment.
  2. You are required to submit a labelled soft copy of your assignment.

 

Legends for Term Used

 

Terms General Description of Work Presented
Excellent
  • Relevant issues consistently identified/discussed/analysed to a very high standard with very clear explanations/rationale/justification.
  • Very strong evidence of wider reading with relevant citations used providing very strong insights into the topic of discussion.
  • Critical analysis very well developed with strong identifications of pros and cons and the impact/implications of both to the issue at hand.
  • Very professionally and creatively presented quality of work that is very neat and tidy with very coherent flows of arguments.
Good/Strong/Clear
  • Relevant issues consistently identified/discussed/analysed to a high standard with clear explanations/rationale/justification.
  • Strong evidence of wider reading with relevant citations used providing strong insights into the topic of discussion.
  • Critical analysis well developed with good identifications of pros and cons and the impact/implications of both to the issue at hand.
  • Some professionalism and creativity shown in the quality of presentation
  • with work that is neat and tidy with coherent flows of arguments.
  • Some / Fair / Somewhat
  • Relevant issues consistently identified/discussed/analysed to a satisfactory standard with good explanations/rationale/justification. Some inconsistencies.

 

 

  • Some evidence of wider reading with relevant citations used providing good insights into the topic of discussion.
  • Critical analysis somewhat developed with some identifications of pros and cons and the impact/implications of both to the issue at hand.
  • Some professionalism and creativity shown in the quality of presentation with work that is somewhat neat and tidy with some coherent flows of arguments.
Poor / Little / Partial
  • Relevant issues consistently identified/discussed/analysed to an inconsistent standard with poor explanations/rationale/justification. Many inconsistencies detected.
  • ·Little evidence of wider reading with relevant citations used providing little insights into the topic of discussion.
  • Critical analysis poorly developed with little or no identifications of pros and cons and the impact/implications of both to the issue at hand.
  • Little professionalism and creativity shown in the quality of presentation with work that is NOT neat and tidy with incoherent flows of arguments.

 

 

Reference ID: #getanswers19120041