BMST5103 Strategic Management Assessment Help
Looking for BMST5103 Strategic Management Assessment Homework Help Service? We are here with our best quality, custom Strategic Management Assessment help in Australia. Assignment Help AUS is an affordable assignment writing services provider. If you want BMST5103 Strategic Management Assessment Help so, connect with us and place your order now!
Assignment Details:
- Words: 10000
ASSIGNMENT QUESTION
Part 1
QUESTION/TASK 1
OBJECTIVE:
The objective of this assignment is to enhance individual student’s skills, knowledge, and cognitive in analysing and evaluating an organisation’s internal and external environment.
REQUIREMENT:
Download the Annual Report 2021 of Sime Darby Berhad from the following
link:https://www.simedarby.com/investor/annual-reports
Conduct Internal and External analysis for Sime Darby Berhad. Prepare the following information.
Part I: Vision and Mission
1.1 Vision – Evaluate the vision
1.2 Mission – Evaluate the mission
1.3 Suggestion – should the vision and mission statements change or maintain
Part II: External Analysis
2.1 Analyse the industry. Identify the 5 opportunities and 5 threats
2.2 Prepare an EFE matrix
Part III: Internal Analysis
3.1 Evaluate the current financial performance of the organisation
3.2 Identify the 5 strengths and 5 weaknesses
3.3 Prepare an IFE matrix
3.4 Prepare a competitive profile matrix (CPM)
Summary
QUESTION/ TASK 2
OBJECTIVE:
The objective of this assignment is to enhance individual student’s skills, knowledge, and cognitive in generating effective and efficient strategies.
REQUIREMENT:
Refer to Task 1, generate strategies for Sime Darby Berhad by using a few matching tools.
Part IV: Matching
4.1 SWOT Analysis
4.1.1 SO strategies (Suggest 2 strategies, and list the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the strategies)
4.1.2 WO strategies (Suggest 2 strategies, and list the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the strategies)
4.1.3 ST strategies (Suggest 2 strategies, and list the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the strategies)
4.1.4 WT strategies (Suggest 2 strategies, and list the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the strategies)
4.2 SPACE Matrix – suggest two strategies.
Part V: Implementing
Design a table that consists of strategies from 4.1 and 4.2; indicate the when, who, and how the strategies should be implemented.
Part VI: Monitoring
Adopting Rumelt’s principles, suggest monitoring tools for all the strategies above in a table.
Summary
Part II
ONLINE CLASS PARTICIPATION
Discuss the following topic in the forum and submit as proof of your participation in the online discussions:
Watch the following YouTube video which explains the strategic issues and plan of Facebook at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gElfIo6uw4g. Discuss what you have learnt from this video in the myINSPIRE forum.
Part I
QUESTION/TASK 1
*QN | CLO | Criteria | Weight | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | Unsatisfactory | Max Marks |
4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |||||
1 |
3 |
Part I: Vision and Mission | 3.5 | Very clear and complete review of vision and mission statement. | Clear and complete review of vision and mission statement. | Clear but brief review of vision and mission statement. | Vague review of vision and mission statement. | No introduction was given or not related.
|
14 |
1 | 3 | Part II: Industry Analysis | 3 | Very clear discussion with the inclusion of all of the opportunities, threats, and EFE table without error. | Clear discussion with the inclusion of all of the opportunities, threats, and EFE table with one to three errors.
|
Clear but brief discussion all of the opportunities, threats, and EFE table with more than three errors. | Vague discussion of the opportunities, threats, and EFE table. | No discussion was given. | 12 |
1 | 3 | Part III: Internal Analysis | 4 | Very clear discussion with the inclusion of all the evaluation of financial performance ratio, strengths, weaknesses, IFE and CPM table without error. | Clear discussion with the inclusion of all the evaluation of financial performance ratio, strengths, weaknesses, IFE and CPM table with one to three errors. | Clear but brief discussion with the inclusion of all the evaluation of financial performance ratio, strengths, weaknesses, IFE and CPM table with more than three errors.
|
Vague discussion of the evaluation of the financial performance ratio, strengths, weaknesses, IFE and CPM table. | No discussion was given. | 16 |
1 | 3 | Summary | 2 | All of the key points of the assignment were summarised.
|
Most of the key points of the assignment were summarised.
|
Some of the key points of the assignment were summarised.
|
Only a few key points of the assignment were summarised.
|
No summary was given.
|
8 |
Total | 12.5 | 50 |
QUESTION/TASK 2
*QN | CLO | Criteria | Weight | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | Unsatisfactory | Max Marks |
4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |||||
2 | 3 | Part IV: Matching | 3 | Very clear explanation with the inclusion of all of SWOT, SPACE, and strategies without error.
|
Clear explanation with the inclusion of all of SWOT, SPACE, and strategies with one to three errors. | Clear but brief explanation with the inclusion of all of SWOT, SPACE, and strategies with more than three errors. | Vague explanation of preparation of the SWOT, SPACE, and strategies. | No explanation was given. | 12 |
2 | 3 | Part V: Implementing | 3 | Very clear table and logic of implementation issues.
|
Clear table and logic of implementation issues. | Clear but brief table but less logic of implementation issues. | Vague table and illogical of implementation issues. | No table was given. | 12 |
2 | 3 | Part VI: Monitoring | 3 | Very clear discussion on adopting Rumelt’s principle in the table and logic of monitoring tools. | Clear discussion on adopting Rumelt’s principle in the table and logic of monitoring tools. | Clear but brief discussion on adopting Rumelt’s principle in the table but less logic of monitoring tools.
|
Vague discussion on table and illogical of monitoring tools. | No discussion was given. | 12 |
2 | 3 | Summary | 1 | All of the key points of the assignment were summarised.
|
Most of the key points of the assignment were summarised.
|
Some of the key points of the assignment were summarised.
|
Only a few key points of the assignment were summarised.
|
No summary was given.
|
4 |
Total | 10 | 40 |
Part II (10%) ONLINE CLASS PARTICIPATION
*QN | CLO | Criteria | Weight | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | Unsatisfactory | Max Marks |
4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |||||
1 |
3 |
Quality of Postings |
2.5 | All five comments are very good, appropriate, relevant, meaningful, & respectful. | Four of the comments are good, appropriate, relevant, meaningful,
Respectful.
|
Three of the comments are somewhat good and appropriate and meaningful.
|
None of the comments are good and relevant. / Comments are short responses that are not substantial nor meaningful.
|
No postings were submitted.
|
10 |
Total | 2.5 | 10 |
Part II (10%) ONLINE CLASS PARTICIPATION
QN | CLO | Criteria | Weightage | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | Unsatisfactory | Max marks |
4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |||||
Quality of Postings
|
2.5
|
All five comments are good, appropriate, relevant, meaningful, and
respectful
|
Three or four of the comments are good, appropriate, relevant, meaningful and
respectful
|
One or two of the comments are somewhat good, appropriate, meaningful and
respectful
|
None of the comments are good and relevant. / Comments are short responses that are not substantial nor meaningful. Minimum effort (e.g. “I agree with Tina”)
|
No postings given as proof of participation in discussion
|
10 | ||
Total Marks | 10 |
For REF… Use: #getanswers2002216 B