BMMF5103 Managerial Finance Assessment Help
Get BMMF5103 Managerial Finance Assessment Questions, and Answers Help by PhD/MBA Experts at an affordable price. Assignmenthelpaus.com provides 100+ subject matter experts assistance. We have an impeccable team of professional experts to help you with your BMMF5103 Managerial Finance Accounting Assessment Help. If you have any problems solving your Managerial Accounting assignments so hurry up and connect to our 24/7 live services; they can solve your assignment problem any time.
Assignment Details:
- Words: 6000
ASSIGNMENT QUESTION
Part I
OBJECTIVE:
The objective of this assignment is to enhance learners’ ability to assess companies’ financial performance.
REQUIREMENT:
Choose any TWO companies listed in the consumer products and services sector of the Main Market of Bursa Malaysia. Assess the companies’ financial performance over the past five years (2016 – 2020).
The assignment should highlight the following aspects:
• Introduction of the consumer products and services sector in Malaysia;
• Introduction of the chosen companies;
• Assessment of the companies’ liquidity position;
• Assessment of the companies’ debt management position;
• Comparison of the companies’ liquidity position;
• Comparison of the companies’ debt management position;
• Expectation of the companies’ financial position for year 2022; and
• Conclusion.
Assignment Format:
a. Use double space and 12-point of Times New Roman font.
b. Provide reference using the American Psychological Association (APA) format, if any.
c. You are required to attach the relevant financial statements of the companies in your assignment (in softcopy).
Notes:
• Plagiarism is not acceptable. If you are not sure what is meant by plagiarism, refer to the various websites which discuss this matter, e.g. owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts.
Part II
ONLINE CLASS PARTICIPATION
Discuss the following topic(s) in the forum and submit proof of your participation in the online discussions:
• What are the qualitative factors that analysts should consider when evaluating a company’s likely future financial performance? Explain.
• Discuss the importance of socially responsible investment (SRI) and how it adds value to investors.
Part I
*QN | CLO | Criteria
|
Weight | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | Unsatisfactory | Max Marks |
4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |||||
1 | 1 | Introduction of the consumer products and services sector in Malaysia
|
1.5 | Clear and detailed introduction which covers the development and growth of the consumer products and services sector in Malaysia (including 2020 and 2021). | Clear introduction which covers the development and growth of the consumer products and services sector in Malaysia (including 2020 and 2021).
|
Clear but brief introduction which covers the development and growth of the consumer products and services sector in Malaysia (including 2020 and 2021). | Vague introduction which covers the development and growth of the consumer products and services sector in Malaysia (including 2020 and 2021).
|
No introduction was given.
|
6 |
1 | 1 | Introduction of the chosen companies | 2 | Clear and detailed introduction of the chosen companies which covers the companies’ names, establishment history and business activities.
Relevant financial highlights were given. |
Clear introduction of the chosen companies which covers the companies’ names, establishment history and business activities.
Relevant financial highlights were given. |
Brief introduction of the chosen companies which covers the companies’ names, establishment history and business activities.
Relevant financial highlights were given. |
Vague introduction of the chosen companies which covers the companies’ names, establishment history and business activities.
No financial highlights were given. |
No introduction and financial highlights were given.
|
8 |
1 | 3 | Assessment of the companies’ liquidity position and debt management position based on relevant liquidity and debt ratios (2016-2020) | 3 | All the relevant liquidity and debt ratios were calculated correctly for each company.
Detailed workings were provided. The ratios were interpreted correctly. |
Most of the relevant liquidity and debt ratios were calculated correctly for each company.
Detailed workings were provided. The ratios were interpreted correctly. |
Few of the relevant liquidity and debt ratios were calculated correctly for each company.
Workings were provided. The ratios were interpreted correctly. |
The relevant liquidity and debt ratios were calculated wrongly (but attempted).
Workings were provided. The ratios were interpreted wrongly. |
No calculation of relevant liquidity and debt ratios was given. | 12 |
1 | 3 | Comparison of the companies’ liquidity position and debt management position | 2.5 | Clear and detailed comparison (analysis) of the liquidity position and debt management position.
Able to explain the relevant factors that influence the companies’ liquidity position and debt management position. |
Clear comparison (analysis) of the liquidity position and debt management position.
Able to explain the relevant factors that influence the companies’ liquidity position and debt management position. |
Clear but brief comparison (analysis) of the liquidity position and debt management position.
Able to explain the relevant factors that influence the companies’ liquidity position and debt management position.
|
Vague comparison (analysis) of the liquidity position and debt management position.
Unable to explain the relevant factors that influence the companies’ liquidity position and debt management position.
|
No comparison of the companies’ liquidity position and debt management position was given. | 10 |
1 | 3 | Expectation of the companies’ financial position for year 2022 | 2
|
Clear and detailed explanation of the expectation of the companies’ financial position for year 2022 (supported with facts and figures).
|
Clear explanation of the expectation of the companies’ financial position for year 2022 (supported with facts and figures).
|
Clear but brief explanation of the expectation of the companies’ financial position for year 2022 (supported with facts and figures). | Vague explanation of the expectation of the companies’ financial position for year 2022 (not supported with facts and figures). | No explanation of the expectation of the companies’ financial position was given.
|
8
|
1 | 1 | Conclusion | 1.5
|
Clear and well justified conclusion.
All relevant key points were clearly highlighted and written in a coherent manner. |
Clear conclusion.
Most relevant key points were clearly highlighted and written in a coherent manner. |
Fairly clear conclusion.
Some relevant key points were highlighted but written in an incoherent manner.
|
Vague conclusion.
Irrelevant points were highlighted.
|
No conclusion was given.
|
6
|
Total | 12.5 | 50 |
Part II
*QN | CLO | Criteria | Weight | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | Unsatisfactory | Max Marks |
4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |||||
2 | 3 | Explanation of the qualitative factors that analysts should consider when evaluating a company’s likely future financial performance.
Discussion of the importance of socially responsible investment (SRI) and how it adds value to investors.
|
2.5 |
All five comments are good, appropriate, relevant, meaningful, and respectful
|
Four of the comments are good, appropriate, relevant, meaningful, and respectful
|
Three of the comments are somewhat good, appropriate, meaningful, and respectful
|
None of the comments are good and relevant. / Comments are short responses that are not substantial nor meaningful. Minimum effort (e.g. “I agree with Tina”) | No postings given as proof of participation in discussion
|
10 |
Total | 2.5 | 10 |
For REF… Use: #getanswers2002216 A