The New Corporate Garage Assessment Answers
Assignment Detail:-
Assessment Task
Individual task
Purpose
This task asks you to connect what you understand about innovation with the concept of a transformative innovation. The task relates to Unit Learning Outcomes 1, 2 and 3.
Detailed Assignment instructions
Read the article The New Corporate Garage (Links to an external site.), and complete the following:
- Write out the article citation (use Swinburne Harvard Reference(Links to an external site.))
- Which form of citation did you choose from the Swinburne Harvard Reference site?
- Why is corporate entrepreneurship important?
- In what way might corporate entrepreneurship link to transformative innovation?
- What is the word count of your response excluding the citation?
Rubric/Marking guide
The rubric at the bottom of this page shows you what we will be marking you on. So ensure your questions and answers display: a critical examination and understanding of material; your ability to synthesis of ideas, concepts and themes; a good standard of written expression.
Module Tasks 2020
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeForm and accuracy of citation
|
6 Pts
Exemplary
Well done! Citation is error free.
|
4.5 Pts
Excellent
Citation contains 1 inaccuracy. You may benefit from revising how to use Harvard Reference Style.
|
3 Pts
Above Average
Citation contains 2 inaccuracies. Please look up how to use Swinburne Harvard Reference Style.
|
2 Pts
Satisfactory
Citation contains 3 inaccuracies. Please look up how to use Swinburne Harvard Reference Style.
|
0 Pts
Below average
Citation contains 4 or more inaccuracies. Please look up how to use Swinburne Harvard Reference Style.
|
|
6 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeCritical examination and understanding of material
|
8 to >6.4 Pts
Exemplary
Response demonstrates an exemplary understanding of the material to answer the questions asked. Response shows an exemplary critique of the material. Questions are addressed confidently and persuasively.
|
6.4 to >5.6 Pts
Excellent
Response conveys an excellent understanding of the material to answer the questions asked. Response shows an excellent critique of the material. Response addresses all questions.
|
5.6 to >4.8 Pts
Above Average
Response demonstrates a good understanding of the material to answer the questions asked. Response addresses all questions.
|
4.8 to >4.0 Pts
Satisfactory
Response demonstrates a basic or less clear level of understanding of the material to answer the questions asked. Response may not address one or more questions.
|
4 to >0 Pts
Below average
Response shows an inaccurate or undeveloped understanding of the material to answer the questions asked. Response may not address one or more questions. Or response is indicative of the use of translation software. Or there is evidence of poor academic practice resulting in the plagiarizing of sources.
|
|
8 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeSynthesis of ideas, concepts and themes
|
8 to >6.4 Pts
Exemplary
Response shows extensive, exemplary application of relevant unit and module theory to ideas/concepts/themes within the material to both create new ideas and link to own field of study.
|
6.4 to >5.6 Pts
Excellent
Response shows an excellent good application of relevant unit and module theory to ideas/concepts/themes to create new ideas or to link to own field of study.
|
5.6 to >4.8 Pts
Above Average
Response demonstrates a good use of relevant unit theory. Response attempts to extend upon, or integrate own field of study with, the ideas/concepts/themes contained within the material.
|
4.8 to >4.0 Pts
Satisfactory
Response demonstrates minimal but satisfactory use of relevant unit theory. Response may not extend upon, nor integrate own field of study with, the ideas/concepts/themes contained within the material.
|
4 to >0 Pts
Below average
Response does not use or inaccurately uses unit theory to extend upon the ideas/concepts/themes in the material. Or response is indicative of translation software. Or there is evidence of poor academic practice resulting in the plagiarizing of sources.
|
|
8 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeCalibre of written expression
|
8 to >7.0 Pts
Exemplary
Written responses are free from grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing is persuasive, informative and engages the reader. The response meets the word limit.
|
7 to >5.6 Pts
Excellent
Written responses are largely free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing is informative, engages the reader and facilitates communication. The response meets the word limit.
|
5.6 to >4.8 Pts
Above Average
Written responses include some grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing facilitates communication . And/or, the response may not meet the word limit.
|
4.8 to >4.0 Pts
Satisfactory
Written responses include some grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing may distract the reader. And/or, the response does not comply with the word limit.
|
4 to >0 Pts
Below Average
Written response contains numerous grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing does not facilitate effective communication. Or, the response is substantially outside the word limit. Or there is evidence of poor academic practice resulting in the plagiarizing of sources. Or the response is indicative of the use of translation software.
|
|
8 p
|
Are you seeking The New Corporate Garage Assignment Help Solutions? We offer the best and excellent Assignment Help Australia that can make students stress-free and relaxed with the assignment writing work. Our service is fast, dedicated and provides quality papers. You can clear any query related The New Corporate Garage Assignment through our 24*7 online chat facility. We have assignment writing experts who work hard to get your project done on time.
For REF… Use: #getanswers2002098
