The 1981 Air Traffic Controllers Strike


Need Help with MBA Communication & Negotiation Skills Assessment II Answers? has a team of more than MBA/PhD expert writers that make future of million students from Australia, UK and USA. Be it your assignment help online, Australian assignment writers or best assignment writing services, is the one-stop solution for all.




Communication & Negotiation Skills Assessment II: The 1981 Air Traffic Controllers Strike


The Case:


In 1981, the Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization union (PATCO) went on strike against the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) in the United States. Effectively, every aircraft controller governed by the federal agency had walked off the job. Previously, the union leader representative, Robert Poli had spent several months attempting to negotiate a new labor management contract with the FAA. A tentative agreement was reached that was then presented to the union members to vote on ratifying the proposal. The tentative contract was rejected by an overwhelming 90% percent of its members. Poli returned to the negotiating table to get a better package from the FAA. Relations had deteriorated significantly between the two negotiating parties. The FAA now dug in its own heels and refused to offer any more concessions or improve the existing offer any further. After an additional two fruitless weeks of further talks between the two parties, Poli instructed PATCO to take strike action of its members against the FAA. Going on strike is normally fine in most circumstances, but here is where Poli exceeded his authority. The contract that had been signed previously with the FAA strictly prohibited a strike action, and deemed that any such strike action as illegal. So, what happened? The FAA and the administration under President Ronald Regan implemented the following steps against Poli, and PATCO’s members:


  1. All striking controllers were immediately fired from their jobs.
  2. A federal injunction against the strike was obtained, and both the union and its leaders were fined several millions of dollars per day for violations
  3. Poli and some of the other union executive leaders were thrown into prison
  4. The union’s financial accounts were impounded
  5. All striking controllers were banned from any further employment with the U.S. government in any capacity whatsoever. It was not until 1993 that President Clinton pardoned the controllers and declared that they could now be re-hired. This was 12 years after the fact!


Answer all the questions, total carries 50 marks.


  1. Did the union use “fair” or “ethical” negotiation tactics? Explain.
  2. Was the government’s response to the strike fair and appropriate? Explain.
  3. Who was at fault in this negotiation breakdown and why?
  4. What do you think could have been done better by the PATCO? By the Government? (Consider communication, distributive vs. integrative bargaining, tactics, ethics, conflict resolution, etc.)



Reference ID: #getanswers2001258