INDG 100 Indigenous Education – History, Cultures, and Experiences of Indigenous People
If you want any kind of help in INDG 100 Indigenous Education and Perspectives Assignment, then Assignment Help Australia Site can help you. We have professional writers for Indigenous Education and Perspectives Assignment who are well trained and highly knowledgeable. We provide our service 24×7 so that student could contact us at any time. Contact us now and get the solutions immediately on Case Study Assignment, Dissertation Writing, Online Essay Writing and so on.
- Course Code: INDG 100
- Course Title: Introduction to Indigenous Studies
- Referencing Styles: Open
- Words: 5500
- University: University of British Columbia
- Country: CA
- In formal English, type and double-space a 5 page, or longer, a summary of the hand-out Healing Historical Trauma: A Report from the Aboriginal Healing Foundation by Marlene Castellano and Linda Archibald (2013). A grading rubric has been included in this course outline.
- Your summary should be divided into INDENTED paragraphs, and the idea in each paragraph should flow logically into the next paragraph. This article summary is NOT a critique…imagine you are giving a synopsis of the article to someone who has never read it. I expect you to use direct quotations to provide “evidence” that your interpretation is true, what Johnson meant.
- You must use 12 point font, double space or 1.5 spacing. Margins at the top/ bottom and sides must be 2.5 cm or close to it. Citations are to be (Castellano & Archibald, 2013, p. XX). Note that the citation is included IN the quotation with the . after the citation!!
You will lose 4 marks if the essay pages are not numbered, OR if the essay is shorter than 5 pages OR you do not reference the way I want, OR you do not use signal phrases as outlined in this course outline. A signal phrase is a phrase, or sentence that introduces a quotation, paraphrase, or summary. A signal phrase includes a verb (such as said or wrote) along with the name of the person who’s being quoted. You should never drop a quotation into your Paper unannounced. Use a signal phrase that incorporates the quotation smoothly into your writing. When using a signal phrase an author: acknowledges comments describe reports adds compares disputes notes respond admits concedes emphasizes observes shows agree endorses points out states argues illustrates reasons suggests asserts declares implies refutes summarizes claims denies insists rejects writes Grading Rubric for Article Summary Excellent Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Overall assessment In the introduction, the article is summarized accurately AND shows the depth of thought. The writer has demonstrated a full understanding of key points in the article. Student’s ideas are fully developed. Offers a well-designed framework of ideas, or purpose, around which to build discussion. One’s “neighbour” would grasp the essential points in the article—expansive and correct use of citations. In the intro, the article is summarized accurately—an adequate understanding of some of the key points in the article. Student’s ideas are somewhat developed. Paper’s “framework”/thesis is mediocre. One’s “neighbour” could grasp some of the essential points in the article. Citations require additional information in the main intro points of the article not summarized accurately. The writer does not appear to really understand the article’s key points. Ideas are minimally developed. No thesis exists. One’s “neighbour” wouldn’t grasp the essence of the information in the article. Citations POORLY did. Organization Entire paper has clear topic sentences Report has a well-defined sense of “unity” as the writer moves from idea to idea. Introduction, body and conclusion are clearly delineated. Writer’s opinions/ideas are very well backed-up by evidence from the article. Most paragraph sentences ARE topic sentences Some paragraphs better organized than others. Reader “guesses” where introduction stops and where the conclusion begins. Some statements/ideas put forward are not well backed-up by evidence. Some ideas too vague. Short, or incomplete sentences with a few topic sentences. Paragraphs lack a single “focus.” No clear separation of intro, body and conclusion. Student’s ideas are not substantiated by evidence from the article—Broad, general statements that don’t really “say” anything. Mechanics Paper is extremely “clear” of spelling errors, typos, and/or grammar mistakes and sentence structure shows “complexity” of thought. The title and author of the article contain enough detail for “neighbour” to locate the article if they wanted to. Paper is “liberally sprinkled” with appropriate citing AND direct quotations. Paper is generally clear of spelling errors, typos and/or grammar mistakes. Sentence structure is appropriate. Something is missing from the date, title and author of the original article. Pages numbered. Paragraphs indented. Margins OK. Line spacing, OK. Paper requires a few more citations OR direct quotations. Paper has too many spelling errors or typos or grammar mistakes. Sentence structure makes student’s ideas difficult to understand. Title and author of the original article are missing. Line spacing not OK. Pages not numbered. Paragraphs not indented. Margins too wide. Citations missing OR direct quotations are missing. Rules: 12 point font, double spaced, margins at the top/ bottom and sides must be 2.5 cm or close to it. I do not require a cover page; just type your name in the upper left or upper right-hand corner. Note that if you are adding more than your name in the upper left or right corner, you must still produce a full 5 pages of your own writing.