CRKC7045 Tackling Global-Local Challenges in Ethics, Responsibility and Sustainability

To get assignment help from our Management Experts regarding CRKC7045 Tackling Global-Local Challenges in Ethics, Responsibility and Sustainability. Assignmenthelpaus.com promises to help students to get through any difficult situation by providing them assistance in assignment writing service, custom essay writing and dissertation writing help.

 

order-now

 

Part 1: Drawing on the key concepts and learning from the online residency:

What are the main challenges you need to tackle as a result of this module? (35%) Submit your work as a 1,400 word report, plus appendix

 

You will need to:

  • Give appropriate context / background on your organisation (or your local community if you are not directly employed at present). You must focus on this organisation for all three exercises rather than analysing a sector or a region more
  • Critically analyse the key concepts of ethics, responsibility and Make sure you use the module resources only to anchor your work in the academic approach of the module. Correctly reference your work.
  • Choose one of the sustainability models studied this week. Explain your choice. Use the model to assess the sustainability of your organisation
  • Present the assessment of your organisation using the model, with appropriate tables or diagrams, as appendix
  • From your assessment, identify three challenges you will tackle on your return and discuss these in the
  • Make sure you look to the future, not the

 

Use the Marking Matrix below to help you understand how your work will be assessed.

 

Criteria and Weighting 70% and above (Distinction) 60% –

69%

(Merit)

50% – 59%

(Pass)

40% –

49%

(Fail)

0% – 39%

(Significant Fail)

Analysis of key concepts (30%) Excellent exploration of key concepts relevant to the assignment. Analysis and evaluation of concepts are critical and

insightful.

Good exploration of key concepts relevant to the assignment.

Analysis and evaluation of concepts are critical

and fairly insightful.

Adequate exploration of key concepts relevant to the assignment.

Analysis and evaluation of concepts lacks

criticality and insight.

Poor exploration of key concepts relevant to the assignment.

Analysis and evaluation of concepts are

inadequate.

Very weak or missing analysis of key definitions relevant to the assignment.
Application of key models to organisational analysis / identifying challenges (30%) Excellent synthesis and application of relevant theory to the requirements of the assignment. The analysis is critical, extensive, insightful and

accurately referenced.

Good synthesis and application of relevant theory to the requirements of the assignment. The analysis is critical, insightful and well

referenced.

Adequate synthesis and application of relevant theory to the requirements of the assignment.

The analysis is appropriate and

relevant.

Weak synthesis and application of relevant theory to the requirements of the assignment. The analysis is weak and vague. Very poor synthesis and application of relevant theory to the requirements of the assignment.

The analysis is inadequate and vague.

Demonstration of experiential learning related to E R S concepts and models

(20%)

Excellent reflective piece of work. There is excellent use of ideas and resources from the

module.

Good reflective piece of work. There is good use of ideas and resources from the module. Fair reflective piece of work. There is clear use of ideas and resources from the

module.

Poor reflective piece of work. The experiential learning from module is vague and unclear in

the assignment.

Very weak reflective piece of work. There is no reference to the module resources.
Format and presentation; coherence, expression and accuracy of references

(20%)

Excellent piece of writing, well-structured, coherent progression of argument, well- articulated and accurately referenced. Excellent introduction and conclusion. Well written, well- structured, coherent progression of argument, reasonably articulated and accurately referenced. Good introduction and conclusion. Fairly well written and structured, some coherence, some inaccuracies in referencing and minor issues with expression. Appropriate introduction and

conclusion.

Poorly written and structured, incoherent and inaccurately referenced. Lacks appropriate introduction and conclusion. Very weak piece of writing. Incoherent and poorly articulated.

Inaccurately referenced. Lacks introduction and conclusion.

 

 

Part 2: Drawing on the concepts and learning from the online residency:

 

Critically explore how far the ideas of evolving best practice (EBP) leadership (L) and partnership (P) could help you address the three challenges identified in part 1 (30%).

 

Submit your work as a six-minute video presentation clearly showing the work you are discussing as well as yourself

 

You will need to:

  • You must answer this part of the assessment by using the three challenges you identified in part 1
  • You will need to create three tables / matrixes in which you show how selected, specific concepts from each of the three sessions could help you address each of your challenges
  • Use the resources for the module to support the ideas and correctly reference
  • Ensure you answer the question ‘how far’ and the limitations of how these ideas may help you
  • Use the presentation to emphasize your analysis and understanding of the specific session ideas you have chosen. Do not just read the tables but refer to them and add analysis
  • Further guidance will be available as part of the tutorial programme.

 

Use the Marking Matrix below to help you understand how your work will be assessed.

 

Criteria and Weighting 70% and above

(Distinction)

60% –

69%

(Merit)

50% – 59%

(Pass)

40% –

49%

(Fail)

0% – 39%

(Significant Fail)

Analysis of key concepts (30%) Excellent exploration of key concepts relevant to the assignment. Analysis and evaluation of concepts are critical and

insightful.

Good exploration of key concepts relevant to the assignment.

Analysis and evaluation

of concepts are critical and fairly insightful.

Adequate exploration of key concepts relevant to the assignment.

Analysis and evaluation

of concepts lacks criticality and insight.

Poor exploration of key concepts relevant to the assignment.

Analysis and evaluation

of concepts are inadequate.

Very weak or missing exploration of key concepts relevant to the assignment.
Application of concepts to assess usefulness in meeting key challenges (30%) Excellent synthesis and application of relevant concepts. Excellent use of all three concepts to assess usefulness in meeting challenges. Good synthesis and application of

relevant concepts. Good use of all three concepts to assess usefulness in meeting challenges

Adequate synthesis and application of relevant concepts. Clear attempt to use all three concepts to assess usefulness in meeting challenges Weak synthesis and application of

Relevant concepts. The analysis is weak and vague. Answer is incomplete.

Very poor synthesis and application of relevant concepts to the Requirements. Answer is incomplete.
Demonstration of experiential learning related to L, P and EBP concepts (20%) Excellent reflective piece of work. There is excellent use of ideas and resources from the

module.

Good reflective piece of work. There is good use of ideas and resources from the module. Fair reflective piece of work. There is clear u of ideas and resources from the module. Poor reflective piece of work. The experiential learning from module is vague and unclear in

the assignment.

Very weak reflective piece of work. There is no reference to the module resources.
Format and presentation; coherence, expression and accuracy of

references (20%)

Excellent presentation. Audio & visual are clear. Excellent articulation of ideas. Excellent tables with detail, and how far. Specific ideas are

correctly referenced

Good presentation. Audio & visual are clear. Good articulation of ideas.

Good tables with detail, and how far. Good referencing

Acceptable presentation. Audio & visual are clear. Good articulation of ideas. Good tables with detail, some minor elements may be less clear. Good referencing Poor presentation. Audio

/ visual unclear, or elements missing. Weak articulation and / or tables. Lack of detail, elements may be less clear.

Very weak piece of writing. Incoherent and poorly articulated.

Inaccurately referenced. Lacks introduction and conclusion.

 

 

Part 3: Drawing on the concepts and learning from the online residency:

 

Critically analyse your experiential learning from the module (35%). Submit your work as a 1,400 word report, plus appendixes

 

You will need to:

  • Draw on the ideas of the Kolb learning cycle (session 1) to critically analyse your own experiential learning gained within the module
  • You should include reflection on how your own values and sensemaking of E R S have been affected by your study
  • Choose 4-5 specific learning triggers from the module to discuss how and why these engaged you. Explain how you plan to behave differently as a result compared with your current
  • Make sure you support your work by including numbered appendices of relevant completed exercises from the Refer to these during your report as required
  • Further guidance will be available as part of the tutorial programme

 

Use the Marking Matrix below to help you understand how your work will be assessed.

 

Criteria and Weighting 70% and above (Distinction) 60% – 69%

(Merit)

50% – 59%

(Pass)

40% – 49%

(Fail)

0% – 39%

(Significant Fail)

Critical analysis of own EL, including values and sensemaking of E R S (30%) Excellent exploration of personal EL. Evaluation of EL through values and sensemaking reflection are critical and insightful. Good exploration of personal EL. Evaluation of EL through values and sensemaking reflection are fairly critical and insightful. Adequate exploration of personal EL. Evaluation of EL through values and sensemaking reflection is largely descriptive but still fairly insightful. Poor exploration of personal EL. Evaluation of EL through values and sensemaking reflection is weak or partial missing or fairly limited. Very weak exploration of personal EL. Evaluation of EL through values and sensemaking is largely weak or missing
Demonstration of learning from specific cues, with clear links to practice

(30%)

Excellent reflection on the application of models to personal practice.

Excellent answers to how practice will develop as a result of learning, and why.

Good reflection on the application of models to personal practice. Good answers to how practice will develop as a result of learning, and why. Adequate reflection on the application of models to personal practice.

Clear attempt to answer how practice will develop as a result of learning, and why.

Weak reflection on the application of models to personal practice. Weak or partially missing answer to how practice will develop as a result of learning, and why. Very weak reflection on the application of models to personal practice. Weak or partially missing answer to how practice will develop as a result of learning, and why.
Demonstration of experiential learning through inclusion of supporting exercises (Appendixes) (20%) Excellent use of appendixes to support reflection and show completion of learning exercises. Good use of appendixes to support reflection and show completion of learning exercises. Fair use of appendixes to support reflection and show completion of learning exercises.. Weak use of appendixes to support reflection and show completion of learning exercises. Very weak or non- existent use of appendixes to support reflection and show completion of learning exercises.
Format and presentation; coherence, expression and accuracy of references

(20%)

Excellent piece of writing, well-structured, coherent progression of argument, well-articulated and accurately referenced.

Excellent introduction and conclusion.

Well written, well- structured, coherent progression of argument, reasonably articulated and accurately referenced. Good introduction and conclusion. Fairly well written and structured, some coherence, some inaccuracies in referencing and minor issues with expression. Appropriate introduction and conclusion. Poorly written and structured, incoherent and inaccurately referenced. Lacks appropriate introduction and conclusion. Very weak piece of writing. Incoherent and poorly articulated.

Inaccurately referenced. Lacks introduction and conclusion.

 

 

Additional Instructions – Please read carefully

 

Your paper must have a clear structure and must include:

  • Cover page
  • Abstract (no more than 150 words in a single paragraph)
  • Table of contents (Table of tables/figures if necessary)
  • References – at Master level you must use in-text citations to support your arguments and any work cited must appear in the References list at the end of the work. Make sure you use Harvard referencing style. You can assess the University’s referencing guide at http://my.cumbria.ac.uk/StudentLife/Learning/Resources/Referencing.aspx
  • You should also make sure you adhere to the University’s academic best practice. Please see Module Guide for details.
  • Questions of clarity regarding the assessment should be addressed via email to the Tutor and not discussed on the Forum. Students are also reminded that discussing answers to the assessment may constitute plagiarism.

 

 

FOR REF… use #2001338

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *