MGT105 Business Communications Assignment 1 to 5 Question and Answer
Total Words : 6000
Are You Searching for MGT105 Business Communications Assignment Questions and Answer for All Level? Then visit AssignmetHelpAUS.com as it offers both assignment help and essay writing services at highly competitive prices. Get the Best Business Communication Assignment Help by MBA/PhD Experts at AssignmetHelpAUS.
MGT105 Business Communications Assignment 1
| Activity Title: | Assignment 1 |
| Paper Number and Title: | MGT105 – Business Communications Level 5, 15 credits, |
| Learning outcome: | LO.1 Discuss advantages and disadvantages of working within teams/groups with reference to relevant business communications theory.
LO.3 Discuss the social and cultural aspects of communication within teams. |
| Conditions: | This is a compulsory assignment. It must be submitted and counts towards your final result for this paper.
The completed assignment is to be submitted to your facilitator via Blackboard by the due date. |
ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
- Contribution: 20%
- Word Count: 1,500 words (+/-10%) excluding your referencing.
- References: a minimum of 4 academically relevant sources should be used to support your work
- Style: Essay
Qualification outcome expectations
Research and referencing: You are required to engage in some research into the theories or concepts underpinning this topic and use other relevant sources beyond the provided reading material in order to successfully complete this assignment. Ensure you are choosing relevant academic sources and using them well to support your arguments. Ensure you include citations and a full reference list using the latest APA guidelines.
Presentation guidelines: Work is expected to be word-processed and submitted as a Word document or PDF, using a clear, readable font and be within 10% of the given word count (excluding any referencing). Include your name, student number and the paper code and assignment number as a header or footer. Reports should include headings or subheadings as required. Essays should include an introduction, body and conclusion. Spellchecking (NZ English) and proofreading of work prior to submission is strongly encouraged. Utilising Studiosity services is highly recommended.
ASSIGNMENT TASK
Write an essay exploring the different communication styles and expectations of men and women in relation to working in business teams.
Include reference to the concepts of inclusion, affection, control, respect, and affinity – emphasising what you have found through your research are the most important aspects to define differences or similarities between the gender communication styles that impact business teams.
Do some further research on the subject of gender and cultural differences in social needs – find at least four (4) additional academic sources to include in your discussion.
Marking schedule
| Criteria | E (0-39) | D (40-49) | C (50-64) | B (65-79) | A (80-100) |
| Social/team relationships the effect of gender –
Communication styles of men Weighting 38% |
The communication styles of men are not discussed with any clarity.
No examples are included to illustrate the communication styles of men |
The communication styles of men are not covered adequately.
Examples given do not adequately represent the effect of gender. The links between discussion point and examples are not clear. |
The communication styles of men are explored and assessed adequately.
The example given clearly illustrate the points made. More detail and discussion would improve the response. |
The communication styles of men and the examples given demonstrate an in- depth knowledge of the effect of gender in social relationships in the team context.
Some interesting points of view included. Good selection of relevant examples included |
The communication styles of men and the examples given demonstrate an insightful and multi- dimensional knowledge of the effect of gender in social relationships in the team context.
Discussion points and examples well beyond the obvious. Excellence. |
| Social/team relationships – the effect of gender
Communication styles of women Weighting 37% |
The communication styles of women are not discussed with any clarity.
No examples are included to illustrate the communication styles of women |
The communication styles of women are not covered adequately.
Examples given do not adequately represent the effect of gender. The links between discussion point and examples are not clear. |
The communication styles of women are explored and assessed adequately.
The example given clearly illustrate the points made. More detail and discussion would improve the response. |
The communication styles of women and the examples given demonstrate an in- depth knowledge of the effect of gender in social relationships in the team context.
Some interesting points of view included. Good selection of relevant examples included |
The communication styles of women and the examples given demonstrate an insightful and multi- dimensional knowledge of the effect of gender in social relationships in the team context.
Discussion points and examples well beyond the obvious. Excellence. |
| Research
Weighting 10% |
Little or no evidence of research, or sources not relevant for the task.
Little or no use of sources to support argument. |
Less than minimum required number of sources used, or sources are not relevant for the task.
Limited or unclear use of sources to support argument. |
Minimum required number of sources used.
Some sources lack strong relevance or authority but are still appropriate for the task. Sources adequately used to support arguments. |
At least minimum required number of sources used.
Sources are mostly well-chosen, authoritative and appropriate for the task. Sources mostly well used to support arguments. |
At least minimum required number of sources used.
All sources are very well-chosen, authoritative and highly appropriate for the task. Excellent use of sources to support and extend arguments. |
| Writing and organisation Weighting 10% | No consideration for presentation.
Little evidence of clear writing or structure, very difficult to follow. The research has not been linked to the main text. Numerous spelling and/or grammatical errors that have a significant impact on readability. |
Inadequate presentation.
Some evidence of clear or structured writing. Limited evidence of meaningful integration of the research with the main text. Some grammatical and/or spelling errors that impact noticeably on readability. |
Adequate presentation.
Mostly clear writing that shows acceptable organisation and structure. The research could be incorporated with the main text more consistently. Few issues around grammar and/or spelling, some of which have a minor impact on readability. |
Good presentation.
Clear writing mainly to the point. Mostly well organised and structured writing. The research is mostly well integrated with the main text. Good spelling and grammar with only minor oversights that do not impact on readability. |
Polished presentation.
Clear, concise and well-structured writing throughout. All research is very well integrated with the main text. Excellent spelling and grammar correct in all aspects. |
| In-text citations and Reference list APA formatted
Weighting 5% |
Very limited or no referencing attempted, or none follows APA guidelines. | References and/or citations do not follow APA guidelines, or limited referencing attempted. | References and/or citations follow some APA guidelines. | References and citations follow most APA guidelines. | References and citations follow all APA guidelines. |
MGT105 Business Communications Assignment 2
| Activity Title: | Assignment 2 |
| Paper Number and Title: | MGT105 – Business Communications Level 5, 15 credits, |
| Learning outcome: | LO.2 Analyse team/group processes and their effect on team/group functions.
LO.3 Discuss the social and cultural aspects of communication within teams. |
| Conditions: | This is a compulsory assignment. It must be submitted and counts towards your final result for this paper.
The completed assignment is to be submitted to your facilitator via Blackboard by the due date. |
ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
- Contribution: 20%
- Word Count: 1,000 words (+/-10%) excluding your referencing.
- References: a minimum of 4 academically relevant sources should be used to support your work
- Style: Report
Qualification outcome expectations
Research and referencing: You are required to engage in some research into the theories or concepts underpinning this topic and use other relevant sources beyond the provided reading material in order to successfully complete this assignment. Ensure you are choosing relevant academic sources and using them well to support your arguments. Ensure you include citations and a full reference list using the latest APA guidelines.
Presentation guidelines: Work is expected to be word-processed and submitted as a Word document or PDF, using a clear, readable font and be within 10% of the given word count (excluding any referencing). Include your name, student number and the paper code and assignment number as a header or footer. Reports should include headings or subheadings as required. Essays should include an introduction, body and conclusion. Spellchecking (NZ English) and proofreading of work prior to submission is strongly encouraged. Utilising Studiosity services is highly recommended.
ASSIGNMENT TASK
This assignment looks at the team processes of leadership and decision-making and the cultural aspects of communication within teams.
The concept of leadership has clear links into theories on motivation and interpersonal behaviour, and communication processes.
Choose a business leader whom you respect and admire. Ideally, they will be someone you have worked with or have had the chance to observe closely. You may even choose to interview them.
Make sure to refer to appropriate leadership and decision-making theories (leadership styles are discussed in course readings, but you are expected to research beyond the course readings).
Discuss the following:
- Introduce your selected leader and discuss their role and leadership style. How does your selected leader make decisions and how does this affect the team processes and in turn team functions?
- How does your leader respond to the challenges of multicultural communication within a team (note, your leader may be part of several teams e.g. a management team, a project team and a business unit team)?
- Why do you think your selected leader is successful in their role?
Marking schedule
| Criteria | E (0-39) | D (40-49) | C (50-64) | B (65-79) | A (80-100) |
| Team processes and their effect on team functions
Leadership styles Weighting 15% |
The leadership style of the chosen leader is not discussed with any clarity.
There is no link shown between leadership styles, other team process and team functions. The impact of the style of the chosen leader is not discussed. |
Links are shown between leadership styles, other team process and team functions, but are still unclear in parts.
The impact of leadership styles needs to be discussed with more clarity. |
Links shown between leadership styles, other team process and team functions are adequate, but would benefit from more detail and discussion.
The impact of the leadership style is discussed and is adequate but would be improved with more depth. |
Links shown between leadership styles, other team process and team functions are in depth
The impact of the leadership style discussed is explored in depth. Some interesting points made. |
Links shown between leadership styles, other team process and team functions are insightful and multidimensional.
Discussion on the impact of the leadership style is in great depth and well beyond the obvious. |
| Team processes and their effect on team functions
Decision making Weighting 20% |
Does not discuss decision making and the effect of that team process on team functions. | Decision making in the context of team processes and their effect on team functions is not discussed adequately.
Points made are unclear. Examples are sparse or irrelevant. |
Decision making in the context of team processes and their effect on team functions is discussed adequately.
Points made are clear but would benefit from more detail. Examples are adequate. |
Good insight shown into decision making in the context of team processes and their effect on team functions
Points made with clarity and covered in some depth. Good selection of relevant examples. |
Excellent insight into decision making in the context of team processes and their effect on team functions.
Points made show great insight and go well beyond the obvious. Excellent selection of convincing examples. |
| Team processes and their effect on team functions
Explaining the selected leadership role Weighting 15% |
The leadership role is not explained
No examples are given. |
The leadership role is not explained with any clarity.
Examples are poorly chosen and lack relevance. |
The leadership role is explained adequately, and the analysis gives some examples but could be strengthened by more relevant examples. | Good insight into leadership roles shown.
Examples and discussion demonstrate a good depth of understanding. |
Excellent insight into leadership roles.
Points made show an in-depth knowledge and go well beyond the obvious. Excellent selection of relevant examples. |
| Discuss the cultural aspects of communication within teams.
Weighting 25% |
Multicultural communication is not discussed.
No examples are given |
Multicultural communication is not explained with any clarity. The examples are poorly chosen and lack relevance. | The concept of multicultural communication is explained adequately, and the analysis gives some examples but could be strengthened by more relevant examples. | Good insight into multicultural communication within a team.
Examples and discussion demonstrate a good depth of understanding. |
Excellent insight into multicultural communication in a team context.
Points made show an in-depth knowledge and go well beyond the obvious. Excellent selection of relevant examples. |
| Research
Weighting 10% |
Little or no evidence of research, or sources not relevant for the task.
Little or no use of sources to support argument. |
Less than minimum required number of sources used, or sources are not relevant for the task. | Minimum required number of sources used.
Some sources lack strong relevance or authority but are still appropriate for the task. |
At least minimum required number of sources used.
Sources are mostly well-chosen, authoritative and appropriate for the task. |
At least minimum required number of sources used.
All sources are very well-chosen, authoritative and highly appropriate for the task. |
| Limited or unclear use of sources to support argument. | Sources adequately used to support arguments. | Sources mostly well used to support arguments. | Excellent use of sources to support and extend arguments. | ||
| Writing and organisation Weighting 10% | No consideration for presentation.
Little evidence of clear writing or structure, very difficult to follow. The research has not been linked to the main text. Numerous spelling and/or grammatical errors that have a significant impact on readability. |
Inadequate presentation.
Some evidence of clear or structured writing. Limited evidence of meaningful integration of the research with the main text. Some grammatical and/or spelling errors that impact noticeably on readability. |
Adequate presentation.
Mostly clear writing that shows acceptable organisation and structure. The research could be incorporated with the main text more consistently. Few issues around grammar and/or spelling, some of which have a minor impact on readability. |
Good presentation.
Clear writing mainly to the point. Mostly well organised and structured writing. The research is mostly well integrated with the main text. Good spelling and grammar with only minor oversights that do not impact on readability. |
Polished presentation.
Clear, concise and well-structured writing throughout. All research is very well integrated with the main text. Excellent spelling and grammar correct in all aspects. |
| In-text citations and Reference list APA formatted
Weighting 5% |
Very limited or no referencing attempted, or none follows APA guidelines. | References and/or citations do not follow APA guidelines, or limited referencing attempted. | References and/or citations follow some APA guidelines. | References and citations follow most APA guidelines. | References and citations follow all APA guidelines. |
MGT105 Business Communications Assignment 3
| Activity Title: | Assignment 3 – Compare and contrast strategies for managing conflict within a team or group |
| Paper Number and Title: | MGT105 – Business Communications Level 5, 15 credits, |
| Learning outcome: | LO.4 Compare and contrast strategies to manage conflict within a team/group. |
| Conditions: | This is a compulsory assignment. It must be submitted and counts towards your final result for this paper.
The completed assignment is to be submitted to your facilitator via Blackboard by the due date. |
ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
- Contribution: 20%
- Word count: 1,500 words (+/-10%) excluding your referencing.
- References: a minimum of 4 academically relevant sources should be used to support your work
- Style: Report
Qualification outcome expectations
Research and referencing: You are required to engage in some research into the theories or concepts underpinning this topic and use other relevant sources beyond the provided reading material in order to successfully complete this assignment. Ensure you are choosing relevant academic sources and using them well to support your arguments. Ensure you include citations and a full reference list using the latest APA guidelines.
Presentation guidelines: Work is expected to be word-processed and submitted as a Word document or PDF, using a clear, readable font and be within 10% of the given word count (excluding any referencing). Include your name, student number and the paper code and assignment number as a header or footer. Reports should include headings or subheadings as required. Essays should include an introduction, body and conclusion. Spellchecking (NZ English) and proofreading of work prior to submission is strongly encouraged. Utilising Studiosity services is highly recommended.
ASSIGNMENT TASK
The study guide text and readings have outlined a range of strategies that can be employed to respond to conflict in a team. The approach used will depend on the situation and your role/position within the team.
Activity 5 required you to take part in a group discussion with other students and come up with a preferred solution to a situation which had the potential for conflict.
You are a team member in a busy communications team in a large organisation. Your team is working on a project to promote a big upcoming event and there is a rising pressure to meet deadlines. There’s a new graphic designer in the team and you have noticed that they spend a lot of time on Facebook during the day. You know that this person voluntarily works late, but it is irritating you that this person seems oblivious to upcoming deadlines when everyone else is working so hard.
The group will have come up with a list of solutions in the activity.
Part A – Select your three preferred solutions from your group activity and explain how each is related to relevant conflict management strategy.
Part B – Compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of the three conflict management strategy. You are expected to use additional academic sources outside of the prescribed course readings to support your analysis, in combination with your professional and personal experience.
Part C – Based on your analysis, what would be your preferred choice to manage the potential conflict in the situation outlined above? Justify your answer.
Marking schedule
| Criteria | E (0-39) | D (40-49) | C (50-64) | B (65-79) | A (80-100) |
| Compare and contrast strategies to manage conflict within a team/group.
Describing strategies to manage conflict
Weighting 40% |
Conflict strategies are not discussed with any clarity. | Conflict strategies are discussed to some extent.
The discussion on conflict strategies lacks clarity. |
The discussion on the range of conflict strategies to consider is adequate but would benefit from more detail and discussion.
Examples are adequate. |
The array is conflict management strategies is discussed in depth. A strong understanding on the considerations and context for selection is shown.
Some interesting points made. |
The discussion on conflict management strategies is in great depth and well beyond the obvious.
Points made are insightful and multidimensional. |
| Compare and contrast strategies to manage conflict within a team/group.
Selecting and justifying a conflict management strategy. Weighting 35% |
A conflict management strategy is not selected or described with any clarity.
Justification does not make sense. No examples given. |
Justification of the selected conflict management strategy is inadequate.
Example given to justify selection and explain context are unclear. |
The discussion on the selected conflict management strategies is adequate but would benefit from more detail and discussion.
Examples are adequate. |
The selected conflict management strategy is well justified. Very useful examples are given to support selection.
Shows strength in understanding the practical application of conflict management strategies. |
The discussion top justifies the preferred conflict management strategy is in great depth and the argument is explicit and thought provoking.
Points made are insightful and multidimensional. |
| Research
Weighting 10% |
Little or no evidence of research, or sources not relevant for the task.
Little or no use of sources to support argument. |
Less than minimum required number of sources used, or sources are not relevant for the task.
Limited or unclear use of sources to support argument. |
Minimum required number of sources used.
Some sources lack strong relevance or authority but are still appropriate for the task. Sources adequately used to support arguments. |
At least minimum required number of sources used.
Sources are mostly well-chosen, authoritative and appropriate for the task. Sources mostly well used to support arguments. |
At least minimum required number of sources used.
All sources are very well-chosen, authoritative and highly appropriate for the task. Excellent use of sources to support and extend arguments. |
| Writing and organisation Weighting 10% | No consideration for presentation.
Little evidence of clear writing or structure, very difficult to follow. The research has not been linked to the main text. Numerous spelling and/or grammatical errors that have a significant impact on readability. |
Inadequate presentation.
Some evidence of clear or structured writing. Limited evidence of meaningful integration of the research with the main text. Some grammatical and/or spelling errors that impact noticeably on readability. |
Adequate presentation.
Mostly clear writing that shows acceptable organisation and structure. The research could be incorporated with the main text more consistently. Few issues around grammar and/or spelling, some of which have a minor impact on readability. |
Good presentation.
Clear writing mainly to the point. Mostly well organised and structured writing. The research is mostly well integrated with the main text. Good spelling and grammar with only minor oversights that do not impact on readability. |
Polished presentation.
Clear, concise and well-structured writing throughout. All research is very well integrated with the main text. Excellent spelling and grammar correct in all aspects. |
| APA referencing
Weighting 5% |
Very limited or no referencing attempted, or none follows APA guidelines. | References and/or citations do not follow APA guidelines, or limited referencing attempted. | References and/or citations follow some APA guidelines. | References and citations follow most APA guidelines. | References and citations follow all APA guidelines. |
MGT105 Business Communications Assignment 4
| Activity Title: | Assignment 4 |
| Paper Number and Title: | MGT105 – Business Communications Level 5, 15 credits, |
| Learning outcome: | LO.1 Discuss advantages and disadvantages of working within teams/groups with reference to relevant business communications theory.
LO.5 Identify theoretical approaches for team building and provide examples of a relevant team building approach in a selected context. LO.6 Develop goals and team/group processes to achieve objectives and justify the approach with reference to business communication theories and models. |
| Conditions: | This is a compulsory assignment. It must be submitted and counts towards your final result for this paper.
The completed assignment is to be submitted to your facilitator via Blackboard by the due date. |
ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
- Contribution: 30%
- Word Count: Part 1 No word count (Team Building programme) Part 2 500 words (+/-10%) (Narrative) excluding your referencing
- References: a minimum of 4 academically relevant sources should be used to support your work
- Style: Plan and Narrative
Qualification outcome expectations
Research and referencing: You are required to engage in some research into the theories or concepts underpinning this topic and use other relevant sources beyond the provided reading material in order to successfully complete this assignment. Ensure you are choosing relevant academic sources and using them well to support your arguments. Ensure you include citations and a full reference list using the latest APA guidelines.
Presentation guidelines: Work is expected to be word-processed and submitted as a Word document or PDF, using a clear, readable font and be within 10% of the given word count (excluding any referencing). Include your name, student number and the paper code and assignment number as a header or footer. Reports should include headings or subheadings as required. Essays should include an introduction, body and conclusion. Spellchecking (NZ English) and proofreading of work prior to submission is strongly encouraged. Utilising Studiosity services is highly recommended.
ASSIGNMENT TASK
In this assignment you get to choose your scenario – you can write a team building plan for:
A). Your own working environment (if you are currently working in a team you might find this option more relevant and even be able to use some of your learning)
… or
B). You are a manager of a small marketing business unit in a local tertiary institute using the following scenario:
Your chosen organisation has had a change of direction and senior management are on a crusade to grow team effectiveness. You have been away on a management team building workshop but this was focussed on developing the managers as a team.
Your manager is now talking to you about how you might develop your own team.
Luckily, you have been studying a Business Communications paper which has given you some great ideas on how to plan a team building programme.
This is a two-part assignment.
PART 1: Design a team building programme
Apply the six steps suggested by Dyer (1994). You should describe the goals and the approach you will take to each. Remember that this is a plan of what you intend to do, it should act as a guide and help your team to understand what the team building programme will entail.
Your plan should also include a planning schedule/timetable to give an overall perspective on the roll out of the programme.
Your plan does not have a word limit but keep in mind it should be a working document for your manager, and most importantly for you and your team (so don’t be too wordy). This part of the assignment is not an essay or a report, it is a plan – so spend some time thinking about how you will structure it.
PART 2: Justification (500 words)
Write a narrative using academic sources and relevant theory to justify how your plan reflects business communication theories and models.
Marking schedule
| Criteria | E (0-39) | D (40-49) | C (50-64) | B (65-79) | A (80-100) |
| Part 1.
Team building goals and plans Develop goals and team/group processes to achieve objectives and justify the approach with reference to business communication theories and models. Weighting 40% |
Plan omits important considerations | Plan contains some good thinking but overall would be unrealistic.
Some of the goals and activities described are inadequate or irrelevant. |
Adequate coverage of the main components required in a team building programme.
Programme is generally realistic but would be improved with more detail. |
Team building programme shows a strong understanding of the components in a team building programme.
Good insight is shown into the practicalities of applying theory in a work programme. Interesting selection of options. |
An excellent team building programme. Comprehensive coverage of planning needs.
Detail and discussion go beyond expectation. Excellent selection of options |
| Part 2.
Identify theoretical approaches for team building and provide examples of a relevant team building approach in a selected context. Application of theory in developing a team building programme Weighting 30% |
Theoretical approaches to team building not evidenced | Theoretical approaches to team building not adequate | Adequate coverage of theoretical approaches to team building.
Would be improved with more detail. |
Strong coverage of the theory behind team building approaches is evident.
Thoughtful and comprehensive coverage. |
The inclusion of theory in the team building approach is insightful and multidimensional.
Excellent selection of team building theory fitting superbly into the team building context. |
| Research
Weighting 15% |
Little or no evidence of research, or s ources not relevant for the task.
Little or no use of sources to support argument. |
Less
than minimum req uired number of sources used, or sources are not relevant for the task. Limited or unclear use of sources to support argument. |
Minimum required number of sources used.
Some sources lack strong releva nce or authority but are still appropriate for the task. Sources adequately used to support arguments. |
At least minimum required number of sources used.
Sources are mostly well-chosen, authoritative and appropriate for the task. Sources mostly well used to support arguments. |
At least minimum required number of sources used.
All sources are very well- chosen, authoritative and highly appropria te for the task. Excellent use of sources to support and extend arguments. |
| Writing and organisation
Weighting 10% |
No consideration for presentation.
Little evidence of clear writing or structure, very difficult to follow. The research has not been linked to the main text. Numerous spelling and/or grammatical errors that have a significant |
Inadequate presentation.
Some evidence of clear or structured writing. Limited evidence of meaningful integration of the research with the main text. Some grammatical and/or spelling errors that impact noticeably on readability. |
Adequate presentation.
Mostly clear writing that shows acceptable organisation and structure. The research could be incorporated with the main text more consistently. Few issues around grammar and/or spelling, some of which have a minor impact on readability. |
Good presentation.
Clear writing mainly to the point. Mostly well organised and structured writing. The research is mostly well integrated with the main text. Good spelling and grammar with only minor oversights that do not impact on readability. |
Polished presentation.
Clear, concise and well-structured writing throughout. All research is very well integrated with the main text. Excellent spelling and grammar correct in all aspects. |
| impact on readability. | |||||
| In-text citations and Reference list APA formatted
Weighting 5% |
Very limited or no referencing attempted, or none follows APA
guidelines. |
References and/or citations do not follow APA guidelines, or limited referencing attempted. | References and/or citations follow some APA guidelines. | References and citations follow most APA guidelines. | References and citations follow all APA guidelines. |
For REF… Use: #getanswers2001595