CRKC7045 Portfolio Part 1: Pre course work Assignment Answers

Searching for Online Assignment Services in Australia? Hire an assignment writer to complete your CRKC7045 Tackling Global-Local Challenges Assessment perfectly. We have subject experts to provide students academic assistance in more than 100 subjects, including MBA Assignment Help and Law Assignment Help. It doesn’t concern you are a fresher or last year student in University, our team will give their best Assignment Writing Help.

Assessment Details:-

Course Title: Tackling Global-Local Challenges in Ethics, Responsibility and Sustainability
Course Code: CRKC7045
Words: 1000+
Deadline: As Per Required

Critically analyse a specific idea from the session that you personally see as relevant to you. You should think of this as a literature review and anchor your discussion in the linked session resources (not slides) and One List readings. (400 words)
Complete the Schwartz Values Survey (SVS) included with the teaching. Use this as a tool to help you critically reflect on your personal values; the values you prioritise, how those values are shaped by influences and experiences in your life, and how your current actions and behaviour reflect your values. Use this reflection to help you complete the template table provided on page 5 and include the table as your answer. (200 words in the table)
Finally, choose a photograph of a place that is personally special to you. Reflect on why it is special to you and try to make explicit links to your values in explaining this. Try to outline how this reflects your ideas of E R S. (100 words)

Assessment Task:-

The pre-course work reflects the skills required for the marked submission and is a formal opportunity for your tutor to guide and support you. You will not receive a grade but you will receive written feedback and guidance. The pre-course work also acts as a foundation to the approach of the course.

You should watch the teaching session (60-75 minutes video) and then use the session resource pack to carry out independent study of the topic.

From the resource pack, you will be linked to all the case studies, readings and further videos you need. You are not required to carry out any additional research and should use the linked resources from the resource pack as the basis of your study. You do not need to try to read everything but, as usual, the more you are able to put in the more you are likely to get out of your study. You should allow at least 5-10 hours for the work.

You should also use the pre-course work as an opportunity to ensure you can access the library OneList. There is a PDF included in under the course overview tab to help you with this. You will need to access the library OneList to successfully complete the course so please contact the librarian (details in the guidance) if you have difficulty.

General guidance:

You should include the usual RKC cover page, authorship and plagiarism statement. Include a brief abstract (up to 250 words) summarising the whole paper (excluded from word count)
Include a table of contents
Use the introduction (200 words) to give brief background about yourself that you are willing to share with your tutor. This should include brief background on the influences that are particularly significant for forming your values related to ERS and your current work role. Then indicate what is to follow in the
You must base your answer on the teaching and resources provided. A minimum of 90% of references should come from the linked session resources / library OneList. Any additional references you choose to include should be particularly relevant to the assessment
You must provide a full reference list in Harvard style at the end of your paper and include the url address for all references (including the unique url link to library OneList readings)
You should use the assessment as an opportunity to develop your academic skills. Please see the UoC skills website at https://my.cumbria.ac.uk/Student-Life/Learning/Skills-Cumbria/ for online guidance on academic writing and referencing. All other support should be through tutor / tutorial
Make sure you include a brief conclusion (100 words) summarising the key points of your
Please submit your work in Word (not PDF)

From the 13 individual level marker values chosen in your SVS exercise, which three values mean the most to you?	Why do you believe this value is important to you?	Reflect on a moment in your life when you really lived this value. What behaviour did you exhibit that supports the value?	How does this value link with your sensemaking of ethics, responsibility and sustainability?
1.
2.
3.

Marking matrix: Your feedback is given against this marking matrix. Use this grid to help you understand what the tutor is looking for

Criteria	Distinction standard	Merit standard	Pass standard	Fail standard	Substantial Fail standard
Critical analysis of concepts relevant to you	Excellent critical analysis. Relevant ideas from the session are clearly identified and analysis is consistently critical, explicit and succinct.	Good critical analysis. Relevant ideas from the session are clearly identified. There is consistent evidence of an attempt to critically analyse relevant ideas	Adequate critical analysis. Relevant ideas from the session are clearly identified. There is clear evidence of an attempt to critically analyse relevant ideas	Weak critical analysis. Relevant ideas from the session are clearly identified but these may be limited. There is likely to be a poor attempt to critically analyse ideas and / or ideas are not relevant	Very weak critical analysis. There is limited evidence of ideas from the session. There is likely to be no attempt to critically analyse the ideas and / or ideas are not relevant
Application of SVS / values reflection to template table questions	Excellent application of a reflection on personal values to the template table. Answers are consistent, well thought through, detailed and answer each of the questions asked	Good application of a reflection on personal values to the template table. Answers are consistent, well thought through, but likely to be strengthened with greater detail. Answers are provided to each of the questions asked	Adequate application of a reflection on personal values to the template table. There will be a clear attempt to answer the questions asked. Answers are likely to be less consistent and / or to be strengthened with greater detail	Weak application of a reflection on personal values to the template table. There is a limited attempt to answer the questions asked. There is a clear need for greater consistency and detail	Very weak application of a reflection on personal values to the template table. There is either none or a very limited attempt to answer the questions asked. Answers are very brief or missing
Experiential learning: demonstration of learning from the course ideas	Excellent demonstration of experiential learning. Answers are explicitly based on excellent use of course resources and readings. There are explicit links from personal sensemaking to course ideas. There is excellent demonstration of engagement with the course	Good demonstration of experiential learning. Answers are clearly based on good use of course resources and readings. There are good links from personal sensemaking to course ideas although these could be strengthened in places. There is good demonstration of engagement with the course	Adequate demonstration of experiential learning. Answers are clearly based on use of course resources and readings with some attempt to link personal sensemaking to course ideas. There is clear demonstration of engagement with the course.	Weak demonstration of experiential learning. Answers make limited or vague use of course resources and readings with little attempt to link personal sensemaking to course ideas. There is poor demonstration of engagement with the course.	Very weak demonstration of experiential learning. It is not clear how answers reflect the course ideas or the questions asked. There is very little, if any, demonstration of engagement with the course.
Presentation	Excellent piece of writing, well-structured, coherent progression of argument, well-articulated and accurately referenced, including url with full Harvard reference list. Excellent introduction and conclusion.	Good piece of writing, well- structured, coherent progression of argument, well-articulated and accurately referenced, including url with full Harvard reference list. Good introduction and conclusion	Fairly well written with a clear organisation structured to answer the question. Coherent, clearly referenced using appropriate course resources but with a clear need to strengthen the use and presentation of referencing. Appropriate introduction and conclusion	Weak organisation, coherence and / or referencing. Parts of the answer may not be fully answered and / or course ideas are not used or correctly referenced. There is little attempt to specifically answer the question that is asked.	Very poor organisation, presentation and referencing such that the confidence of the reader is compromised.

Social Responsibility and Ethics in a Business

Hire a skilled and qualified writer from Assignment Help AUS and get the best solution on Ethics, Responsibility and Sustainability Assignment. We are Australia’s No.1 Assignment Writing Company and only hire highly knowledgeable and proficient writers. Getting services from us is 100% safe and secure, and we guarantee 100% plagiarism free Online Assignment Help from our team.